FOOD FOR THOUGHT


Bike Insurance Boat Insurance Car Insurance Caravan Insurance Courier Insurance HGV Insurance Home Insurance Horsebox Insurance Landlord Insurance Lorry Insurance Minibus Insurance Motor Fleet Insurance Motor Trade Insurance Motorhome Insurance Salon Insurance Taxi Insurance Tradesman Insurance Van Insurance
Bank Accounts Car Value Protection Credit Cards Income Protection Loans Mortgage Protection
Courier Insurance Directors & Officers Insurance Employers Liability Insurance HGV Insurance Hotel & Guest House Insurance Landlord Insurance Lorry Insurance Minibus Insurance Motor Fleet Insurance Motor Trade Insurance Office Insurance PI Insurance Pub Insurance Public Liability Insurance Restaurant Insurance Salon Insurance Shop Insurance Takeaway Insurance Taxi Insurance Tradesman Insurance

Posts Tagged ‘Junk food’

Pestered Parents Push for Junk Food Advertising Ban

Wednesday, March 7th, 2012

1,015 parents completed a poll commissioned by the Children’s Food Trust and it was revealed, 65% of them believe a ban should be in place for junk food advertisement before the 9pm watershed. Nearly half of those surveyed (45%) admitted they are influenced by their children when they are food shopping. Similarly, 40% of parents find it hard to buy healthy food when they experience “pester power” from their children.

By having junk food adverts shown throughout the day, children are likely to be exposed to a variety of sugary, salty and high in fat snacks. Seeing these tempting treats promoted so widely encourages youngsters to constantly request these unhealthy foods such as burgers, crisps, sugary drinks and salty snacks. For many parents the pressure is too much and they find it easier to succumb to their child’s demands.

Rob Rees, chairman of the Children’s Food Trust, said “Parents have such a tough job to encourage their children to eat healthily – and what’s clear is that they think there are lots of ways we could make their lives easier. This isn’t about a ‘nanny state’ – it’s about what will help rather than hinder parents in feeding their children well. If we’re serious about reducing the crippling costs to the NHS of poor diet, we need to get behind parents on this.”

While the elimination of television ads would be beneficial, 69% admitted they too could do more to promote a healthy diet. Cooking alternative healthier recipes is a good start but for some parents who may struggle to find their own great recipe, treating the family to a restaurant meal can be a way of introducing everyone to delicious healthy foods.

For those restaurants that specialise in guilty pleasure foods, having good restaurant insurance can provide peace of mind if demand begins to slow down.

Companies still Advertising Junk Food to Children

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

nesquikWe previously blogged about how fast food adverts on TV increases kid’s cravings and before that, fast food adverts aimed at children had been banned during children’s TV programmes.

However, food companies including Cadbury, Kellogg’s, Nesquik, and Rowntree has set up websites with cartoon characters, games and videos, which are obviously aimed at children.

Researchers say how these companies are using social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, and also by emailing children directly, to contact them.

While the government had become complacent, junk food companies were acting like “wolves in sheep’s clothing”, the researchers has warned.

Ministers have previously been criticised by doctors, as they allowed food companies to sit on committees to formulate policy on public health matters.

Unhealthy TV adverts cannot be advertised during children’s programmes, but rules do not apply online.
The report, from the British Heart Foundation (BHF) and the Children’s Food Campaign (CFC), calls for stricter rules.

The report stated that fast food companies use techniques which many children do not identify them as advertising.

It said, “Companies are exploiting gaps in the regulations to target children online with promotions for products that cannot be advertised on children’s television.

“As a result, children continue to be swamped with commercial messages with one purpose: to persuade them to consume unhealthy products.”

The researchers found that Facebook allows kids to influence each other, as they can ‘like’ a page which leads to subtle messages that various products are fashionable.

Researchers behind the report also signed up to the Sugar Puffs website and received emails every week over a 3 month period. They were also able to send branded e-cards to friends.

Children who used the website were asked to see permission from their parents if they were under 16 years old, but only had to ticket the ‘verify’ box to continue.

Policy manager at the BHF, Mubeen Bhutta, said, “Like wolves in sheep’s clothing, junk food manufacturers are preying on children and targeting them with fun and games they know will hold their attention.

“Regulation protects our children from these cynical marketing tactics while they’re watching their favourite children’s TV programmes but there is no protection when they’re online.

“The marketeers must be rubbing their hands with glee because this loophole gives them carte blanche to reach eight in 10 children behind their parents’ backs.”

Paul Wheeler, from Kellogg’s, said, “It is absolute rubbish to say Krave’s digital marketing is aimed at kids as you need to be 17 to follow Krave on Facebook, play the Krave game and take part in our Krave vote.

“And only people 16 or over can sign up to the Krave newsletter.

“The report’s authors would have discovered this if they’d bothered to check their facts with us.”

Doctors, parents and other people in the food industry who do not support junk food like healthy restaurants, commercial restaurant insurance providers and various suppliers are backing up the report and the BHF and CFC.

A spokesperson from the Department for Culture Media and Sport said, “Most online space has been covered by advertising codes for some time, but in 2010 the Committee of Advertising Practice extended online protections further.

“Regulations now cover promotional activity by companies on their own websites, on social networking sites and the use of adver-games and user-generated content.”

Should there be a Tax on Junk Food?

Friday, August 26th, 2011

Academics have insisted that the Coalition should tax fatty and sugary foods, as they caution that by 2030, nearly half of all adults in Britain will be obese.

According to public health experts, much stronger systems are needed to stop the increasing cases of obesity.

In the study that was published in The Lancet, in 2008, 26% of British women and men were obese, but if historical trends continue, the figure could rise to 46% by 2030 which means that, in less than 20 years time, there could be an additional 11 million obese people.

This is a worrying number because people who are overweight tend to suffer much more from heart disease, diabetes and cancer. Not only could people suffer with more problems, but so would the NHS. Obesity could cost the state £32 billion a year by 2050, which is almost a third of today’s NHS budget.

For most food, there is currently no VAT. It would be politically fraught if this was to change, as with the rising cost of other things like restaurant insurance UK, minimum wage increases, tighter rules and regulations, businesses have already been affected. However, the main reason is because it would hit poorer homes the hardest.

Taxing unhealthy drink and food would save governments billions by reducing obesity-related illness, as well as bringing in revenue, says Professor Steven Gortmaker from the Harvard School of Public Health.

Gortmaker calculated that a tax about unhealthy food would save California about $1.5 billion (around £1 million) a year with their population of 37 million people.

According to Gortmaker, his analysis showed a ‘fat tax’ was the single most effective measure, in terms of lives saved, followed by traffic light food labelling, and tighter control of advertising junk food to children.

Oxford University Professor, Klim McPherson, who also worked on the obesity forecasts, has condemned the Coalition ministers for believing that they could fix the obesity problems without radical action.

Denmark has put a tax on their unhealthy food, but it doesn’t seem likely that Britain will follow suit.

The Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, said that “rather than nannying people we will nudge them”. He added that “Nudges are very important. Tax is not a nudge, tax is a shove.”

Many would feel a food tax – even on unhealthy products – to be a tax on living. Deciding what or how to tax would also be a minefield.”

Fast Food Adverts on TV increases Kid’s Cravings

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

A recent study that was published in Paediatrics showed that television advertisements for fast food really do make kids hungry for those treats, especially if they watch a lot of TV.

To combat obesity, there are an increasing number of calls to ban junk food advertisements that are aimed at kids. The latest call was from the American Academy of Pediatrics, which released a policy statement on junk food ads on Monday.

Emma Boyland, from the University of Liverpool in the UK, led the research which involved 6 to 13 year olds, found that a DVD featuring junk & fast food advertisements seemed to boost children’s appetite for the featured foods.
There was a larger craving for fatty and sweet foods after viewing the advertisements, compared to days when the kids involved in the research just watched advertisements for toys.

Children who watched over 21 hours of television a week, found the results to be especially true, compared to those kids who watched less TV.

Researchers were modest and said the effects of the food only made a small difference in the average number of food items the kids said they wanted “right now”.

Boyland wrote “There are too many variables to take into account. It will never be possible to show in an experimental study that food commercials contribute to obesity”.

Other factors that could contribute to kids eating more junk food in real life, include the willingness of their parents to buy those foods and young children’s “pester power”.

Lori Dorfman, who has studied food marketing to children and is the director of the Berkeley Media Studies Group in California, said that “This study verifies the increasing, sustained effect of food marketing on television: the more kids watch TV, the more susceptible they are to advertising”.

Dorfman added “This wouldn’t be so bad if marketers put their best foods forwards, but they don’t”.

Children are topping up their hours of watching TV nowadays as it’s easily accessible on mobile phones, computers and gadgets, Dorfman noted.

Dorfman also said “Food companies are spending $2 billion on advertising each year, targeting kids with irresistible adverts for high-fat, salty, sugary foods and it’s simply not reasonable to expect parents to counter the companies alone”. To counter the fast food advertisers, we also need support from other people, including restaurants, suppliers, celebrity chefs, restaurant insurance providers, the government and supermarkets.